Project Reviews - Dates and Requirements
This stuff is lifted from Narayanan’s blog.
Review 1 - 03/01/08, 4/01/08
*Introduction about the project
*Literature Survey
*Analysis
*Hardware, Software specification
Review 2- 31/01/08, 01/02/08
*Design(Diagrams, Algorithms)
*Module-I Demo
*Unit Test Report for Module-I
Review 3- 14/02/08, 15/02/08
*Module-II,III Demo
*Unit Test Report for Module-II,III
Review 4- 07/03/08, 08/03/08
*Remaining Modules Demo
*Unit Test Report
*Integration Test Report
*Future Enhancements
*Bibliography
Review 5
*Model Exam - Full Demo (21/03/08)
*Project report submission (22/03/08)
Just like the Anna University syllabus, this stuff is vague and not very helpful.

January 3rd, 2008 at 8:00 pm
What you want to do in your reviews is entirely left to you. No prescribed format really.
Literature survey I think means getting hold of documentation available on the field you are working on. Not sure though.
For your first review, you just need to tell them how much progress you have made on the proposed outline and how you are going about the other stuff. (Which you should have done in 0th review I guess)
January 3rd, 2008 at 8:02 pm
I think literature survey is getting hold of literature to show existing schemes so that you can compare your proposed idea against it. (And show that your’s is actually better.)
For your project, you should probably divide into a few modules that can be put together and then complete one module at a time.
January 3rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Muhahahahahaha I can do anything at anytime. No one says anything. Well they do but I can just ignore and they will leave it. My college rules!!
January 4th, 2008 at 1:25 am
Karthik, try telling that to our lecturer. Apparently the introduction should be 10 to 15 pages long. Don’t even ask.